Gaddafi Reported Arrested, Killed

Former Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi

Giant news from the Arab world this morning as reports claim that Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi has been captured and killed by rebel forces in his hometown of Sirte. Reuters, the BBC, and other international news outlets are reporting Gaddafi's death, although it has not been confirmed by U.S. news agencies or by the American government. A gruesome cell phone photo that is reported to be the corpse of the Libyan dictator has been broadcast on MSNBC and other networks.

With Gaddafi having been in power over 40 years (since the Nixon administration to put it into context), his imminent demise poses large questions about what happens next in Libya.

As the Arab Spring continues in to fall, Libya is just the latest Arab nation making headlines as civil unrest spreads across the Middle East and Northern Africa. Since last December, we have seen political revolutions resulting in the ousting of longtime dictatorial leaders in Tunisia, Egypt , and Libya, and we have witnessed uprisings and civil protests in Bahrain, Syria, Yemen, and other Arab states.

The fire of rebellion spreading through the Arab world is exciting, and the idea that real organic democracy (not the Bush-imposed brand used in Iraq) may take hold in these nations inspires hope. With these revolutions though also comes uncertainty, and a pressing need for cautious and balanced American diplomacy and leadership (this is not time for walking tall and carrying a big stick).

As we celebrate the downfall of cruel and tyrannical dictators, we should all, regardless of political affiliation, hope our leaders are capable of thoughtfully positioning the U.S. favorably in great Arab unknown. The Arab Spring presents historical opportunities for our nation to forge new positive relationships in the Arab world. Our leaders must exercise enormous care to make sure we take an appropriate role in these events that allows us to leverage these opportunities to make new friends, or at least to avoid making new enemies.

Carter's Middle East Opinions Deserve Serious Consideration

Former President Jimmy Carter has an arguably more complete and profound understanding of Middle East politics than any President before or since. With Palestinians pushing the UN Security Council for a "statehood"vote this week, the former President is lobbying in favor of an independent Palestinian state, and his opinion should be (but won't be) seriously considered.

Carter views Middle East issues and events in a broad historical context, and the policy positions he advocates are intended to serve both justice and American interests in the long-term. Say what you will about his success as an American President, but you can't ignore his Middle East expertise and accomplishments which include:

• The Camp David peace agreements between Israel and Egypt during his presidency
• His role in designing and negotiating the Geneva Accords in 2002-2003
• The success of the Carter Center in fostering peaceful solutions in international conflicts (work for which the former President has received a Nobel Prize)

As a political leader no longer seeking office, Carter also has the luxury of being able to state his Middle East opinions unequivocally, without concern for the impact of his pro-Palestinian statehood position on his image or electability. When you consider that his policy positions bring him no personal loss or gain, and you couple with his vast historical understanding of the region, it's hard not to take President Carter's recommendations as relevant, serious, and ultimately correct.